by Bob Schildgen
Published on December 27, 2004 By sunshinedaydream In Politics
Bush's 7 Deadly Sins

1. Turning Mom Into a Superfund Site
A Bush proposal to weaken clean-air rules would put three times more mercury into our air and water than existing rules would allow. One in six women has enough mercury in her system to risk her kid having brain damage, mental retardation, blindness, seizures, and speech impediments. Not exactly friendly to the rights of the unborn, is it, George?

2. Belly Flop in a Cesspool
Nobody much likes sewage, except maybe sewer rats or those albino mutant lizards they say inhabit the pipes. So why did Bush, on his inauguration day, rescind a rule to cut down on sewage dumping? And then he goes from belly flop to flip-flop. First, Bush whacked a new regulation to reduce the arsenic in drinking water. A few months later--after a public outcry--he agreed to cut arsenic down to the same limits they have in Old Europe.

3. Playing With Fire
Bush touted his "Healthy Forests Initiative" as a way to stop catastrophic wildfires, but it actually allows more logging on 190 million acres--which could lead to bigger fires, because it lets timber companies cut the large trees that resist burning. He also claimed this would protect family homes, even when these trees are dozens of miles away, and when fire experts say the best way to keep a building from burning is to make a clearing around it, not in the next county.

Speaking of combustion, the United States burns through 20 million barrels of oil every day. But Bush's global-warming energy plan called for opening almost 70 million more acres to oil exploration.

4. Lying, Denying, Censoring, Cheating, and Other Misundemocratic Behavior
If global warming makes you nervous, well, ignore it. That's exactly what Bush's EPA did when it sliced a whole chapter on climate change from its 2002 annual report on pollution.

There was plenty of practice for denial and deletion, the most notorious case being just after the attack on the World Trade Center. The EPA found levels of asbestos and other pollution thousands of times above normal around the disaster site. But the White House ordered the agency to announce that it was safe.

Then Dick Cheney's energy task force refused to reveal what went on in its meetings--until the courts forced the Energy Department to cough up some of the records. The department even swiped $136,000 from its solar, renewable energy, and energy conservation budgets to produce 10,000 copies of the task force's drill-America-first report.

5. Coddling Criminals
A Texas-tough law-and-order guy, Bush executed 152 people while he was governor, and the state's prison population jumped 60 percent. Yet the first year he ran America, clean-air inspections fell off 30 percent, clean-water and clean-air criminal referrals declined by 50 percent, and criminal referrals for violations of rules controlling toxic substances dropped 80 percent.

6. Putting Polluters on Welfare
At the very heart of conservatism, compassionate or otherwise, is sturdy, all-American, bootstrap-grabbing self-reliance and responsibility. Therefore, you'd expect Bush to make big-time polluters shell out to fix their messes, also known as Superfund sites. (That's how the notorious Love Canal got cleaned up.) But Bush policy exempts the polluters from paying, so taxpayers will now foot the Superfund bill by themselves.

7. Flattening Teddy's Bears and Twain's Frogs
The Bush administration has weakened environmental protection on 234 million acres--as much as Teddy Roosevelt set aside. This means more logging, roadbuilding, mining, oil drilling--and the manly art of snowmobiling. To make it easier for snowmobilers, Bush's Forest Service proposed building a bridge to roar deeper into grizzly territory in Montana's Flathead National Forest. This was after he snuffed a ban on snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks.

Bush even went after Mark Twain's celebrated jumping frog, yanking protection from 4 million acres of the California red-legged's habitat. He did protect 33,000 acres in Southern California for the kangaroo rat. But since these rodents are marvelously adapted to arid environments, it may be that he's just saving them for a role in desert warfare.


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Dec 30, 2004
what I have against abstinance only is the only part. If the moralizing does not get thru, there is nothing to stand back on. They point to the failure of birth control methods, well duh because they being used incorrectly or not being used at all. Why are they not being used correctly? Because methods teaching how to use birth control are being replaced by abstinance only or because of they were never taught in the first place because of moralism or lack of funding. There has also been a moral stigma attached to birth control. You stated earlier that the right is not against birth control, but now admit they back abstinance only. Abstinance only does not teach about how to use birth control, and many times they state that birth control is a sin. This is the official position of the conservative side of the Catholic church. Its a position also taken up by many in the immoral minority. Birth control failure can be linked to ignorance and outright scorn. Ignorant kids are out there believing that they don't need birth control because pregancy or std's will never happen to them. She looks clean, he's so handsome they could never have std's. They either use no condoms or use lambskin condoms which have no protection against std's. You're right, the best laid plans of mice and men go astray. When they do, ignorance should not rule, education should.
on Dec 30, 2004

Reply #31 By: whoman69 - 12/30/2004 9:00:41 AM
what I have against abstinance only is the only part. If the moralizing does not get thru, there is nothing to stand back on. They point to the failure of birth control methods, well duh because they being used incorrectly or not being used at all.


So just how is teaching *more* of the same going to change this?

Birth control failure can be linked to ignorance and outright scorn.


This is garbage. Outright scorn I'll go along with. But ignorance? No way. They have been taught your way and unfortunatly many seem to ignore it. This is NOT a new problem! So maybe it's time to push something else.
on Dec 30, 2004
So maybe it's time to push something else.


I think you should put the emphasis on the word push as that very accurately describes what abstinance only is trying to do, push their own morals on everyone.

Ignorance because when condoms are used correctly, they work. That is a problem of people not having the knowledge to use them. Ignorance because people still cannot believe that they are in a position to have unwanted pregnancies or stds when they are not used. The programs to teach about birth control were either stopped by the right or did not have the funding available. It has never been tried my way on a general basis. But now big government Bush is making sure the money is available for abstinance only.
on Dec 30, 2004
Reply #33 By: whoman69 - 12/30/2004 1:34:34 PM
So maybe it's time to push something else.


I think you should put the emphasis on the word push as that very accurately describes what abstinance only is trying to do, push their own morals on everyone.

Ignorance because when condoms are used correctly, they work.


Your missing it! They have been taught that before and it didn't work! You think this problem sprang full blown overnight? The abstinence only has only started recently (last 4 years)

It has never been tried my way on a general basis


Yes it *was*! The programs were stopped only a short while ago because they were not having the desired effect! Kids were *still* having kids and there were still STD's being passed around.



Each year, nearly one million teens in the US, approximately 10% of all 15-19 year old females -- become pregnant. About 1/3 of these teens abort their pregnancies, 14% miscarry, and 52% (or more than half a million teens) bear children, 72% of them out of wedlock. Of the half a million teens giving birth, roughly 3/4 are giving birth for the first time



Few people would argue for a return to the days of ostracism. But some people who work closely with teens now wonder whether the accepting attitude toward teen pregnancy that evolved in the last quarter-century is actually contributing to the phenomenon.



FYI abstinence only was NOT being taught during 1/4 century. At least not to the degree it is being taught today.
In 1970, the birth rate for females ages 15 to 19 in the city of Milwaukee was 59 per 1,000. The number climbed to 75.6 per 1,000 in 1980 and then to 94 per 1,000 in 1985. At that point, the city made national headlines for having the nation's highest rate of births among black teens, reporting that out of 3,953 births to black women, 1,175, or 29.7%, were to teens. State health officials demanded that more money and programs be dedicated to the teen pregnancy problem. A few years later, one north side alderwoman was so exasperated she actually suggested sterilization as a way to keep the city's teen pregnancy rate under control. Yet even with the added attention, teen pregnancies continued to rise. By 1990, the Milwaukee Health Department reported the birth rate for females ages 15 to 19 at 117.8 per 1,000. The numbers finally began to dip in the 1990s. In 1995, the teen birth rate was 106 per 1,000, and by 2000, the rate was down to 89.5 per 1,000. That's still nearly double the national teen birth rate of 50 per 1,000.
Got news for you! *Birth Control* WAS being taught in the 70's I know because that's when I was IN school and was recieving sex education.
on Dec 31, 2004
Who's the genius that thought of banning abortion and ALSO teaching abstinence only? What a mind! I suppose sometime in the near future people are going to stop fucking entirely? People, even if it's illegal, are going to stop having abortions? Or will the deathrate in women rise exponentially all over this nation due to backalley abortion techniques, just like last time abortion was illegal in this country? I hate to tell you, folks, but people are gonna have sex outside of wedlock, like it or not. People are also going to have abortions, like it or not, legal or illegal. So why ban abortion and teach abstinence at the same time? People are not going to stop fucking anytime soon, no matter what someone's personal moral agenda may be. People need to be educated so that they can make their own decisions wisely.
on Jan 04, 2005
Your list of "Bush's seven deadly sins" is more of your own opinion that acual fact.

Very good!!! Evan Trivett
this is my opinion rather than actual fact. Thats why I blog about it to hear other peoples opinions. And I think yours sucked asss!

3 Pages1 2 3